Search This Blog

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

rossetti more context

1.
Dates of birth and death
  • 5th December 1830, London
  • 29th December 1894 (breast cancer, having been diagnosed in 1892).
2.
Early life
  • Youngest of 4 children, who were largely self-supporting, especially in terms of relationships. Educated at home by the mother
  • Born to poet and political exile Gabriele Rosetti (Italian immigrant who maintained deep attachment to his native country) and Frances Polidori.
  • Christina grew up bilingual
  • Household was frequently home to politically engaged Italians and lively debate on political and artistic topics
  • Dante – founder of Pre-Raphaelite movement, illustrator and editor to some of Christina's poems. Challenged Classical influence of Raphael, emphasis on intense colours, inspiration in mediaeval culture, Romantic poetry. Christina rejected the development of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, refusing to have her poetry read at their meetings (although she had sat for Dante's earlier paintings).
  • Maria – eldest of four, who eventually became a nun.
  • William supported Christina financially for most of her life.
  • Vivacious in her youth, and known for her tempestuous and fractious nature – but grew to be considered overscrupulous and excessively restrained.
  • Mother strongly religious; family converted in 1840s from Evangelical faith to Anglo-Catholicism with the Oxford Movement.
  • Regular visits to Grandfather's countryside estate and to zoo at Regent's Park fostered deep love of natural world – hence detailed engagement with nature in her work. Reinforced by visits to Italy and the 'unimaginable beauties and grandeur of nature' in the lakes (linking with sense of affinity with Italy).
  • In adolescence, Christina suffered from a variety of ailments, diagnosed as a heart condition but potentially psychosomatic in nature, e.g. breathlessness, heart palpitations, other symptoms of anxiety. Illness relevant to morbidity often observed in her poems.
3.
Blokes
  • James Collinson – member of Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Worshipped at same Anglican church as Christina, but soon converted to Roman Catholicism – his first proposal was declined but he was accepted after his re-conversion to Protestantism in 1848. However, he re-re-converted to Roman Catholicism and the marriage was called off. Some biographers doubt whether Christina was in fact in love with him.

4.
Engagement with social issues
  • No direct alignment with politics (possibly as a reaction to the home environment).
  • Deep concern and compassion for others – volunteered as a nurse in Crimean War but rejected; worked at St Mary Magdalene's Penitentiary for Fallen Women from 1859 and later for House of Charity at Highgate.
  • 1863 – donated 'A Royal Princess', a work with a theme of social inequality, to an anthology published for the relief of workers in Lancashire.
  • Spoke passionately against slavery, military aggression, child prostitution, and vivisection (performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research).
  • In favour of female suffrage, but advocated valuing genders equally but accepting their differences ('her office is to be man's helpmeat' – 1879). Not a feminist in this respect.
  • Against any radical questioning of the status quo.
5.
Deaths in her family
  • 1854 – father, after Christina had been his main carer
  • 1876 – Marie, due to cancer
  • 1882 – Dante Gabriel
  • 1886 – mother
  • Aunts in 1890 and 1893

babylon the great

1.
Significance of title
2.
Form
  • Allegorical poem
  • Petrarchan sonnet – ironic use as these are usually used for love poems
3.
Rhyme and rhythm
  • Stress is on the first syllable, which gives a powerful imperative warning tone
  • Octave: ABBAABBA
  • Sestet: CDDECE
4.
Techniques
  • Repetition of 'gaze not upon her'. 'Gaze' has connotations of fascination, intense engagement, voyeurism, thus sexual implications.
  • Simile – 'as spotted panther lusts in lair'. Sexual intentions, carnivorous, evil, animalistic. Also latteral alliteration.
  • Polysyndetic triadic structural progression, drawing attention to her multitude of wealth, used to lure and seduce.
  • Use of colour: scarlet = sexually immoral. Lexical field of red: 'heart', 'blood', 'lusts', 'wine', 'scarlet', 'desire', 'fire'.

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

character in Maude clare

Rossetti uses many techniques to tell us about the characters in 'Maude Clare', however I will be concentrating on some in more depth.

One thing that is used with great effect to present the character is speech. The dialogue between the characters can tells us a lot about them, for example the fact that the "son Thomas" only says one thing in the poem and he stutters etc shows us that he is weak in comparision with Maude Clare and Nell. For example he says "Lady" "- Maude Clare" and he then hides his face. This shows us he may have a guilty conscience and is ashamed of what he did. This could be interpreted to mean that he led Maude Clare on, or that he feels he has married the wrong woman. Maude Clare has the most speech in the poem, this shows us how powerful she is and how she is hijacking the attention from Nell even though it's her wedding day. This could influence our opinion of her and make us think of her as spiteful as she is purposely ruining someone's wedding day. To make it worse she is effectively telling everyone about an affair she had with Thomas. For example "That day we..." and "My half of golden chain" both suggest some former intimate relationship between the Maude Clare and Thomas, so this tells us about the relationships between some of the characters. 
Through speech we also see that Maude Clare wants nothing more to do with Thomas, she says to Nell "I wash my hands thereof". This shows that Maude Clare has the upper hand in all ways. She is rejecting Thomas even though it looks like he initially rejected her, so she is taking the power back. This also shows her appeal to Nell to also defy Thomas and leave him and his "fickle heart" despite having just married him. The final character we learn of through dialogue is Nell. We see that although Maude Clare is dominating the attention, she is still a strong woman. She doesn't seem embarassed by the things that have been said she just moves on. She says she will stay with Thomas whatever, "For he's my lord for better or worse". This shows that she is willing to uphold him and that she is an amiable and resilient character. Finally the speech illustrates that Maude |Clare is still at the centre of everything, even when it looks like Nell has prevailed. For example although Nell has the last word, these last words are "Maude Clare" so it shows even Nell can't help but mention her name. So Rossetti reiterates that she is the main focus by leaving her name in our thoughts at the end.

Descriptions of the characters are also useful in learning about them in the poem. For example the comparison between Maude Clare and Nell shows us how there is a difference in status between them. Maude Clare is described as a "queen" and Nell a "village maid". She is obviously not as beautiful or as composed. This again illustrates Maude Clare's power as it shouldn't be this way, it's Nell's wedding day so she should be the centre of attention. The mere fact the title is 'Maude Clare' also tells is she is the focus. 
The description of Thomas and Nell tells us how they feel about each other, for example Rossetti compares them. Thomas was "pale with inward strife And Nell was pale with pride". So basically Thomas isn't happy with marriage, perhaps as he has feelings for Maude Clare, whereas Nell is happy and pleased.

Finally it is obvious that the women characters hold the power in the poem. As I mentioned before we only hear a man speak once in the poem and he falters and looks weak. So the men are not seen to be important or to have any significant power. So Rossetti has switched the stereotype round so that the power is in the women's hands (perhaps because on a wedding day women are normally in control). It is also Nell and Maude Clare that are in conflict/discussion over everything, Thomas doesn't have any imput.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

as froth on the face if the deep

Summary 

In The Face of the Deep, Christina Rossetti proceeds carefully through the book of Revelation, verse by verse, examining Saint John’s text, not so much for a map or timeline of the Apocalypse as for gems of wisdom and encouragement for Christians hoping to redeem the time until Christ’s return. She notes that other exegetes have connected the text to historical events, but she does not presume to do so authoritatively. Though she occasionally hazards such a reading, she maintains a characteristically Tractarian reserve. She warns against idle curiosity and encourages adoration of Christ as the final goal of Revelation.
In chapter 1, she notes that Christ reveals to us the things we need to know—and these things reveal Christ to us. To know Christ and to become like him is much more important than to see into mysteries and make prognostications. Our response to the revelations is twofold: We obey any commandments and receive the mysteries thoughtfully, as the Blessed Virgin pondered the angel’s announcement.
Throughout the book, Rossetti intersperses poems and prayers composed in response to the text she is evaluating. Typically, didactic prose does not resonate deeply enough to express her thoughts. Her doctrinal emphasis is evident in frequent reference to the prayers and creeds of the Book of Common Prayer (1549). In addition, her expansive knowledge of Scripture is seen in the almost constant connections she makes between the verses of Revelation and texts throughout the Old and New Testaments.
Regarding the angels of the seven churches (in chapters 2 and 3), Rossetti comments briefly on the text, then develops a variety of devotional meditations, including one on “Some Biblical Tens”: the ten commandments, ten strings on David’s instrument, ten lamps for the wise virgins, and so on. Her connections are often surprising and insightful. She notes that each of the churches has a unique enemy and reward, but the common way to achieve victory is to overcome. She provides an outline of the goals and necessary actions for each church, relating this to Christian living.
Chapter 4 describes John’s vision of God enthroned in heaven; Rossetti’s exegesis is painterly in its description of the symbolic significance of elements in the vision. In chapter 5 she directs our thoughts to the fact that Christ alone is worthy to open the Book of Life; he has earned the right through his incarnation and humanity, as Son of man.
In light of the terrifying images of the apocalyptic horsemen and dreadful punishments depicted throughout Revelation, she notes that in the face of danger, faith is unafraid, for the wrath of the Lamb is reserved for those who reject God’s righteousness and truth. Angels, even fallen angels, are messengers of God proclaiming his will, and the terrors work his will. Still he is merciful, for each punishment allows some time for repentance.
In discussing lengths of time, such as 42 months or 1,260 days, she does not suggest a timeline but urges Christians to live immediately, as though the period has begun or is about to begin. She calls readers to participate in good works with all believers, using wisely whatever time is left before the final judgment. In relation to numbers, such as the number of the beast and 144,000, she suggests that the qualifier, “he that hath understanding,” disqualifies most readers. Wisdom, she says, is a “practical grace” and can be found through meditation on Scripture as it points us to the characteristics of God and Christ and his redemptive work.
Rossetti reminds us that while the desolation brought about by the pouring out of God’s wrath will be completely devastating, historically we have had “foretastes” of such things and ought to repent. She personalizes this by including a prayer for England’s deliverance from luxury and injustice.
Chapter 19 describes the marriage feast of the lamb; Rossetti compares this union to those of the patriarchs and their brides. She notes that all that is masculine is a type of Christ as Bridegroom, while all that is feminine is a type of the Church as Bride, and for these examples she turns to “holy maids and matrons” of the Old Testament and “their sister saints” of the New Testament. In a meditation on the figure of Christ on a white horse, she creates a list of Christ’s attributes as prompts for worship.
In the descriptions of final punishment in chapters 19 and 20, Rossetti sees the triumph of the saints who have persevered. The dragon, Satan, in chains is cause for a meditation on prayer. She urges Christians to pray for themselves, for one another, for the world, and for the lost. She praises the saints, especially the martyrs, but she emphasizes that, while Christians in modern times may not be called to a martyr’s death, still they may be a “martyr in will,” firm in faith, receiving a crown of glory.
Our earth is temporary, yet our actions have eternal consequences and rewards. In the new heaven and earth, Rossetti notes the fulfillment of the Beatitudes. In the new Jerusalem, she sees the lesson of “present abasement, future exaltation,” encouraging those, like herself, who have experienced “tears, death, sorrow, crying, pain” to look forward to their end in the presence of Christ enthroned in this new city, where all promises shall be fulfilled. Until then, we are left with the benediction of Saint John, the “grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Christian Themes

One of the themes of this devotional commentary, according to Rossetti herself, is patience. This is the lesson she hopes to find in her study of the Apocalypse. She finds that to resist Satan and overcome temptation, we must have desire and action but also patience and endurance: “Patience,” she says, [is] “a tedious, indomitable grace.” Patience is necessary for the “Church Militant” in this world; it “goes with sorrow, not with joy”; tribulation develops patience, experience, and hope. In the end, it ushers the “Church Triumphant” into the joys of Heaven. She sees Saint John, as well as the souls of the martyrs under the heavenly altar, as examples of “patient obedience.” She reminds Christians to not be weary in well doing; tribulation should be viewed as a privilege through which patience yields perfection.
Prayer is another theme. Not only does Rossetti include numerous original prayers corresponding to the verses she examines, but also she repeatedly encourages Christians to pray for insights from the Holy Spirit, for strength against temptations, for the strengthening of others, for increased zeal among Christians, and for the repentance of the lost.
She recognizes that we are each responsible for our influence on those around us, “children, servants, less educated persons”; all of our actions influence for either preservation or destruction. The Christian is edified and sustained by the graces of the Church, “The purifying grace of Baptism, the maturing grace of Confirmation, the sustaining grace of Holy Communion.” Enlivened with these graces, Christians are able to persevere in holy living and will exert a positive influence on others.

A christmas carol

Summary:

In "In the Bleak Midwinter," Rossetti begins her poetic retelling of the Nativity story by describing attributes of the winter season, which is when Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. In this scene, there are traditional elements of the traditional Nativity story found in gospels of the New Testament, including the stable where Jesus was born, his mother, the Virgin Mary, and the angels and animals who worshipped the baby. Rossetti concludes by imagining herself in the position of a Shepherd and Wise Man, and declares that her heart is the one gift she can offer Jesus.

Analysis:

Rossetti opens "In the Bleak Midwinter" with a simple yet powerful description of winter. Her personification of the moaning wind gives the first line a child-like tone. Rossetti pairs up natural elements for straightforward similes: "Earth stood hard as iron, water like a stone." The simple couplet rhyme scheme, which continues throughout the poem, gives the reader a sense that Rossetti is telling a familiar and much beloved tale. The phrase "Long ago" adds to the nursery-tale tone.
Rossetti does not introduce Christ and his human incarnation until after the first stanza. When she finally does, it clearly becomes the focal point of the poem. The second stanza encompasses the core of Christian theology: Christ must be born on earth, live and die as a human, and then be resurrected and return at the end of the Earth. In the midst of this complex theology, Rossetti includes the repetition of her opening line, "In the bleak midwinter," as if to bring comfort to such mysterious and detached theological doctrine.
The third stanza shows Jesus as content with the lowly circumstances of his birth. Rossetti's word choice is appropriately humble, as she repeats the pattern, "Enough for Him, whom..." in the first and third lines of this stanza.
In the fourth verse, Rossetti contrasts the magnificent divine with the humble circumstances of Jesus' nativity. She borrows the biblical phrases "Angels and archangels" and "cherubim and seraphim," allowing the internal rhyme sounds to enhance the poem's melodic meter. She emphasizes the importance of Christ's humanity through the image of Christ's mother kissing her baby. In this verse, Rossetti also celebrates the unique value of human love.
In the fifth and final stanza, the poet places herself in the poem by wondering what gift she would offer the baby Jesus if given the chance. Her repetition of "If I were" and "what can I give Him" in this stanza add to the child-like earnestness of the poem. In general, Rossetti limits her poetic devices to the song-like aa bb couplet rhyme scheme. However, her restraint speaks volumes about her attitude towards divine mysteries that require a child's innocent and sincere faith. The final enjambment in the last line suggests the poet's decisiveness in her desire to give her heart to Jesus.

Title
‘A Christmas Carol’
The title is worth considering here because it gives us some clue as to the content and the tone of this poem, as well providing an indication of its author’s aspirations. Rossetti did not provide the music, but she did provide a fairly large hint about her ambitions for this poem, inviting readers (and perhaps composers) to view this as a potential song. Carols are popular hymns, stressing accessibility and enjoyment, and can thus safely incorporate religious folk traditions, including events not necessarily depicted in the bible. Can you spot any of these in Rossetti’s poem?
Tone
Though carols are generally supposed to be joyous, this one sounds a typically Rossettian sombre note. This midwinter is particularly ‘bleak’, an impression reinforced by the frequent masculine rhymes tolling soberly throughout (‘moan’ / ‘stone’;  ‘snow’ / ‘ago’; ‘day’ / ‘hay’; ‘there’ / ‘air’; ‘bliss’ / ‘kiss’; ‘am /’ lamb’; ‘part / heart’). The poet’s use of assonance allows us to hear the wind moaning throughout the first stanza(the ‘o’ sound in ‘moan’/ ‘stone’; ‘snow’ / ‘ago’).
The repetition of the word ‘snow’ as well as the phrase ‘snow on snow’, accumulates, enacting the gradual buildup of snowflakes that takes over the line, nearly obscuring all other words (stanza 1). The tone shifts in stanza 5 from bleak to anxious as as the speaker wonders, ‘What can I give Him?’ The speaker is excluded from this biblical scene not only by time (these events happened ‘long ago’), but by her humble status. She is so ‘poor’ that she is beneath even a ‘shepherd’, let alone a ‘Wise Man’. 
Speaker
It is only in the second stanza that we realize there is a speaker here, about whom we are told very little. Why then, have I assumed the speaker is female? Not (as you might suspect if you didn’t know me better), because a woman wrote this poem, but because this poem is very much about the gifts women specifically have to offer. Shepherds who proffer lambs in this bible story are male, as are of course the ‘Wise Men’, who offer wisdom and riches. However, it is none of these which thaws the frozen landscape. After all, a shepherd’s lamb is only symbolic of Mary’s much greater sacrifice of her son, while all the wisdom and material goods at the disposal of kings will not achieve the salvation of mankind.
The non-humans in this poem, while impressive, still fall short of the mark. Though ‘cherubim’ and ‘angels’ may worship the Christ child, a ‘Breastful of milk’ is ‘Enough for him.’ Poor, a woman and a virgin (see her ‘maiden bliss’), Mary has accomplished the greatest miracle on earth without male assistance, bringing true nourishment and warmth to the baby (and by extension thawing the frozen, formerly hard-as-iron world), with the simple, specifically female gifts of milk and a mother’s kiss. The speaker is quick to notice that these gifts are available from ‘His mother only’. The reference to breast brings to mind the closeness of a suckling child to a mother’s heart, a cue our speaker picks up on in the final stanza.
The speaker realises that the female heart (and by extension, a woman’s love) is a natural as well as a supernatural gift, capable of transcending the material, and here perhaps, time itself. Though the events of Christ’s birth took place ‘long ago’, the speaker can include herself among his worshippers by offering the timeless, priceless gift of her heart. Presumably, this will be ‘Enough for Him’.
The poem’s final line leads us to suspect that speaker and poet may be one and the same: ‘Yet what I can I give Him: give my Heart’. From another Victorian poet, this might come across as mawkish or overly simplistic, but from Rossetti, the offering is as authentic and sincere as the simple language in which it is delivered. This imaginative solution to the speaker’s dilemma can also be read as a celebration of female creativity. This poetic offering continues to appeal because we know Rossetti means it; poetry is Rossetti’s heart, and the most valuable gift she can think to present, both to her God and to her readers.

Memory

“Memory” is a poem about a woman’s voluntary renunciation of love, although still cherished in memory in this life, with the hope for a perfect consummation of romance in a paradise of eros beyond the grave. What William Rossetti noted about his sister is relevant to the theme of self-abnegation in “Memory”: “She was replete with the spirit of self-postponement.” She created a poetry of deferral, deflection, and negation in which these denials and constraints gave her a powerful way to articulate a poetic self in critical relationship to the little that the world offers and to help her become one of the most moving religious poets of the Victorian era.
Antony H. Harrison, in Christina Rossetti in Context (1988), asserts a direct relationship between her strong religious sense of the emptiness of all worldly things and her portrayal of self-abnegation in a passionate romance: “As is clear to any student of Christina Rossetti’s poetry, vanitas mundi is her most frequent theme, andthis theme is as pervasive in her secular love poetry, as it is in her devotional poems, where a wholesale rejection of worldly values and experiences would be expected.”
Particularly arresting in “Memory” is the unusually honest and graphic description in part 1 of the woman’s courageous decision that leads her to relinquish and yet cherish in memory her deferred love of another. The arduous psychological process of delaying the consummation of romantic passion as a matter of coolly deliberate, even ascetic, choice is an uncommon theme for love poetry, and Christina Rossetti handles her unusual subject matter with a compelling excellence.
Although this is not really a Pre-Raphaelite poem, “Memory” does exhibit some traits of her brothers’ artistic preoccupations, such as an interest in a lover’s passionate devotion for a departed lover, as in Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s “The Blessed Damozel,” where an escapist hope of reunion in an afterlife also cheers a disconsolate female speaker overcome with a comparable longing for love.



The Poem

“Memory” is a poem of thirty-six lines expressing a woman’s voluntary renunciation of love, which, remembered with wrenching self-abnegation in life, will be consummated with her beloved in an afterlife of perfect fulfillment.
Part 1 of the poem was written in 1857, and part 2 came into being in 1865, when Christina Rossetti was at the height of her creative powers. The sister of the two Pre-Raphaelite writer-artists, Dante Gabriel and William Michael Rossetti, Christina gave expression to some of the escapist Pre-Raphaelite tendencies in her own poetry. She had, however, a uniquely religious sensibility, influenced by her intense involvement with the Anglo-Catholic movement within the Victorian Church of England. One of the greatest English religious poets of the nineteenth century, she strove for a disciplined purity in her daily life, giving up not only theater, opera, and chess, but even two suitors for her hand in marriage because of her scruples about the beliefs of one man and the lukewarm piety of the other.
“Memory” is a striking testimony to a woman’s conscious rejection of love in her life, a courageous choice alleviated only by remembrance of her love and by the hope that the relationship will be renewed in paradise. The five stanzas of part 1 stress the woman’s loneliness and courage in her choice to renounce love and yet to hide it in her hollow heart where it once gave joy. She has always kept her love a secret, and its renunciation required a stoically cool objectivity in the wrenching process of her rigorous self-examination and exorcism of love in this life. Nevertheless, her chilling choice to forgo romance in life has broken her heart, which gradually dies within her and causes her to age prematurely.
The four stanzas of part 2 examine the aftermath of her choice and elaborate on the single optimistic note of part 1—that love survived in the woman’s memory despite the decision to reject romance: “I hid it within my heart when it was dead” (line 2). Part 2 affirms the enduring vitality of her supposedly dead love in the hiding place of her heart, where romantic memories reign over her existence through cold winters and splendid summers. Although she no longer worships a love that is “buried yet not dead” to her (line 30), in the autumn of her life, she indulges in romantic memories and dreams of a consummation of her love-longing in a paradise of love.

Forms and Devices

“Memory,” a lyric poem consisting of nine four-line stanzas termed quatrains, has a rhyme scheme of abab in part 1 and abba in part 2. It is noteworthy that in part 2 the initial and final lines of each stanza end with the same feminine (or weak) rhyme, in keeping with the sense of the poem’s conclusion that the woman’s stoic renunciation of love has softened into tender remembrance and a fond hope of eventual reunion beyond the grave.
In part 1, the prevailing meter is iambic pentameter (“ǐ nused ǐt ín my bósǒm whíle ǐt líved”), although the last line of each stanza employs iambic trimeter (“ǎlóne ǎd nóthig sáid”). In part 2, the metrical system in each stanza alternates between iambic pentameter (with an extra short sound on the feminine end rhyme in the first line of each stanza) and iambic dimeter (with an extra short sound on the feminine end rhyme in the last line of each stanza):
I have a room whereinto no one enters   Save I myself alone:There sits a blessed memory on a throne,   There my life centres.
Cooperating with this appropriately controlled but fluctuating sound system is an abundance of assonance and consonance in the poem (“I nursed it in my bosom while it lived”).
To underscore the contrast between experienced love and deferred love, the poem employs the earthier metaphor of having formerly “nursed” a vital love in the “bosom” in contrast to the chaster, more literal equivalent of having now “hid” a dead love in the “heart” (line 2). There are other metaphors, such as “the perfect balances” to convey the cold objectivity of the woman’s judgment in renouncing earthly love (lines 9-12), such as “the bloodless lily and warm rose” to suggest the seasons and her lingering love (lines 27-28), or such as “life’s autumn weather” to indicate her aging process (line 33).
The poem verges on allegory, a literary form that tells a story strong on meaning rather than on narrative, capitalizing on personified abstractions rather than on concrete symbols, characters, and events. Thus, the woman must contend with the personified abstractions of “truth” (lines 5-6), the “idol” love (lines 15, 17), and “a blessed memory on a throne” in her heart (line 23), where her life centers—without sinful idolatry—and where her buried love still lives (lines 24, 29-32). All this is a semiallegorical dramatization of the woman’s inner psychology of love deferred through self-discipline.
The poem is terse and elliptically understated in its severe language. The diction is monosyllabic and bare-boned in its simplicity to convey the stoic determination to withhold love in life for a perfect consummation of romance in the hereafter.

'What would i give' Christina rossetti analysis essay

Compare the way Rossetti defines her relationship with God in the poems ‘What would I give?’ and ‘Twice.’
Rossetti defines her relationship with God in both poems as compulsory with her requiring God in her life.  ‘What would I give?’ is based on Rossetti needing to be cleansed of her sins in order for her to have a positive close relationship with God as it’s humans ‘iniquities which have separated ’people from God whilst, ‘Twice’ is based on God being her main and only real love, with no one else being close to God’s significance.  

The title ‘What would I give?’ immediately gives the reader an insight into how Rossetti is feeling, as the rhetorical question suggests that Rossetti is reflecting on what she would sacrifice in order for a better gain. The rhetorical question also allows the reader to reflect and enables them to empathise with Rossetti as the use of the personal pronoun ‘I’ creates a personal connection between the reader and the poem and enables them to think on what they may need to do in their life for a desired result. The opening line immediately signifies that Rossetti is referring to religion with her asking ‘What would I give for a heart of flesh,’ a Biblical passage and this may inform that reader that Rossetti is reflecting on God’s desires as God wants the ‘heart of stone’ to be replaced with the ‘heart of flesh.’ The heart of stone is sin, and it appears that Rossetti is weighing up how much she would ‘give’ in order to meet God’s expectations, which suggests she feels she needs God in her life highlighting her relationship with God is compulsory.
The title ‘Twice’ has a more ambiguous meaning, nevertheless from the poem I can infer that Rossetti is referring to two loves with the first love being a man- (‘O my love’), (‘O my love’) and the second and only necessary love being God -‘O my God,’ ‘O my God.’ It appears as if Rossetti realises that man’s love is not genuine love as with a ‘critical eye,’ they scan you whilst Rossetti believes she needs God’s love because God is the ultimate judge. This could be the reason as to why ‘O my love’ is written in brackets as man’s love is not real love and significant, but ‘O my God’ is not in brackets with God being the definition of unlimited unconditional love. The ‘broken heart in my hand’ further implies that Rossetti loves God and only needs God as God loves a ‘broken and contrite heart.’ This therefore shows that in both poems Rossetti sees her relationship with God as fundamental however, refers more to what she would sacrifice to make sure she’s on God’s good side whilst the other is more about God being the definition of true love.  
In ‘What would I give?’ each stanza is three lines and based on its clear link to religion, one could argue that Rossetti representing the Holy Trinity. Rossetti constantly mentions the heart and in Christianity being in a relationship with the Holy Trinity enables you to have that ‘heart of flesh,’ and not a heart ‘hard and cold and small.’ Alternatively, each stanza being three lines could also be Rossetti showing how simple it should be to sacrifice everything because as shown in Twice, God is her main love. Rossetti desires to be ‘clean again’ and knows how simple it is for God to cleanse her. The fact that there are varying sentence lengths however, may suggest that Rossetti knows repentance and being pure is not as simple as she may desire it to be. She asks ‘What would I give?’ but we never know if she actually is cleansed of all iniquities, and the fact that her ‘spirit has fallen dumb’ implies that she is still struggling with her relationship with God.
The form of Twice is regular with each stanza being 8 lines and Rossetti may be highlighting the basic elements of Victorian society as well as the theme of religion. ‘Yet a woman’s words are weak’ shows the futility of women’s expression, as the Victorian era was patriarchal with women being presented as the gender solely needed for reproduction in society.  Nevertheless, Rossetti comes to the realisation that the ‘contemned’ love of man is not worth it and has ‘nor questioned since’ her love with God, because as Literary critic Joshua Bocher stated, Rossetti is aware ‘God is always present’ and ‘love for God always trumps the love of another human.’  Rossetti may believe everyone in society should feel the same way because she is a devout Christian,and therefore uses a simple regular structure to portray this view. Both ‘Twice’ and ‘What would I give?’ show the need for God however, ‘What would I give’ shows the complexity of trying to get closer to God, whereas Twice shows the simplicity of how God is the one Rossetti needs and ‘shall not question much.’
‘What would I give?’ has a quite a dark tone which creates irony because of the link to God.  The repetition of ‘wash’ shows the continuous purgation Rossetti feels she needs, because God cannot stand sin. The dark tone with adjectives such as ‘scalding tears’ show that a walk with God is much more complicated than Rossetti presents in Twice. Rossetti appears to be more optimistic in ‘Twice’ with the quote ‘I shall not die, but live’ possibly showing her determination of not experiencing a spiritual death. Contrastingly to ‘What would I give?’ where Rossetti states and questions what she can do in order to get a closer relationship with God, in ‘Twice’ she does not need to question anything as she is almost demanding that she ‘purge thou [its dross] away.’ 
To conclude, Rossetti sums up her need for God in both poems, however she seems more determined in Twice to actually fulfil God’s requests. ‘What would I give?’ creates a more humanistic connection as one would assume that it is not easy to just ‘purge’ the ‘black stain’ as we are constantly live in sin and it is that battle between the flesh and the spirit. 



'What would i give' Christina rossetti analysis


     What Would I Give? demonstrates a narrative shift much greater than the differences between Song and Up-Hill. The second character (thou) of Song and the second voice of Up-Hill are both entirely removed, and the tone itself of What Would I Give? is dramatically darker and bitter. Initially it seemed that “more doubtful” could have been attributed as well; however, what the narrator seems to doubt in What Would I Give? is entirely different than what could have been (but was not) doubted in either Song or Up-Hill. In What Would I Give?, the possibility of doubt is not in the correctness of the narrator's belief, but in the decision of the narrator to have ever embraced that belief.

     The narrator here is using their faith and belief as an explanation of why they would say, “What would I give for a heart of flesh to warm me thro', / Instead of this heart of stone ice-cold whatever I do; / Hard and cold and small, of all hearts the worst of all.” This stanza makes two things clear; first, that the narrator is a cold and potentially cruel being, and second, that they are both aware and regretful of this. Discerning that it is their belief system that shrunk and petrified the heart of the narrator is difficult, and the conclusion reached is admittedly not one that would have been found had Song, Up-Hill, and the author's biography not been read before What Would I Give?

     In the final stanza, the author says, “To wash the black mark clean, and to thaw the frost of years, / To was the stain ingrain and to make me clean again.” (8-9) Whether the “black mark” is meant as a metaphor or something literal is (as it always is with poets!) difficult to determine. Considering it as a literal reference, the black, ashen cross made on the forehead of believers during certain Catholic rituals comes to mind. Should this be the mark that the narrator speaks of, then it would be their faith that has, ironically, socially damned them in their pursuit of avoiding spiritual damnation.

     That the tiny, cold emotional core of the narrator is a result of their faith is hardly surprising given the earliest poem in the scope of this assignment. In Song, the narrator doesn't so much as try to drive her “dearest” away from her as much as use her faith to do it; their aloof, uncaring nature for the mortal world would drive most of us mortals, grounded in remembering as we are, away. What Would I Give? strikes then as the bitter work of trying to determine whether the loss of her humanity was worth her belief.

     Regardless of the frustration and depression that the narrator's ashen cross seems to have caused, it is important that here, as in both of the other poems, the narrator never calls into question the correctness of her belief – this, she seems to hold as fact. The title of the poem, however, does ask the question if she would forsake her faith now if it could mend and enlarge her shriveled heart; although they never quite approach an answer to this question, their answer seems to be a resounding no, as no hint is given as to what they actually would give.

¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦



            In the poem, What Would I Give? by Christina Rossetti, readers experience a sense of resentment throughout each stanza. The speaker clearly has some anger towards their own heart, words, tears, and all around spirit. They casually speak about wanting things that they do not have within them already, or simply things that they have given up within their life. Rossetti not only communicates the wishing of a religious rebirth; but also shows the speaker has distinctly chosen to not conform with Victorian gender roles, while wishing they had followed the rules of Victorian society.
The first line, “What would I give for a heart of flesh to warm me thro’,” (1) shows the speakers resentment of how their heart is cold and how they wish they could have a heart that is like everyone else’s. The contrast between the warmth of the heart they wish they had, and the coldness of the heart they do have, gives off a feeling of life and death. We can see that the narrator is unhappy in their life and feels as though they are dead inside They are surrounded by others with hearts full of warm flesh, which are beating and lively compared to the speakers. The line “Hard and cold and small, of all hearts the worst of all.” (3), highlights not only the “stone” heart they mentioned before, but also the life this speaker continues to have after defying the gender roles. Their heart is the “worst of all” due to the sins they have undertaken in their lifetime.
The second stanza begins the notion of religious rebirth. The rebirth-like scene has yet to show up in this stanza, but the line “What would I give for words, if only words would come;” (4) create an atmosphere of a person calling out to God in their time of need. Although, the words that this narrator speaks is never enough for them to be forgiven by God, even when they wish they were. Their spirit is no longer savable and has fallen lifeless to the ground. The narrator knows that their spirit no longer has happiness connected to it, creating a death-like scene. The last line in this stanza, “O merry friends, go your way, I have never a word to say” (6) emphasizes the loneliness this speaker feels. The loneliness is from the sins they have done, in which they can no long call out to God; or call out to people who have already conformed to gender normality.
The last stanza connects both Religion and Victorian Ladies and Gentlemen. Throughout this part, the readers can notice a sense of disgust that this person has with themselves. The line, “What would I give for tears, not smiles but scalding tears,” (7) highlights the persons want at become someone they are not. The use of “scalding tears” emphasizes the fact that this person feels the need to punish themselves because they know the sins they have done, and know they are not forgivable. They don’t want normal tears, nor do they want smiles, but specifically “scalding tears”. The use of “scalding” reminds readers of heat, relating to Hell. This allows us as readers to assume the narrator knows that is where they belong. The use of “black” highlights death, darkness, and sins. Using the word “clean” right after shows that they wish to be cleaned of all their sins. This can also be related back to men and women not wanting to conform to gender roles, but knowing that people will see it as a sin if they don’t. The speaker wishes they could go back and clean themselves of their disobedient ways.
In all, Rossetti gives readers a poem that can be related back to Religion and Victorian Ladies and Gentlemen, by her specific use of syntax and the words she chose within the poem. Her use of punctuation in the middle and at the end of each stanza, creates a heartbeat rhythm of someone whose heart is not a steady beat. This relates back to the beginning of the poem where the narrator is wishing for a heart of flesh, instead of a heart that is no longer in use. The religious aspect is expressed throughout the entire poem with the contrast of warm and cold. Readers can also find this aspect in the last stanza, by considering religious re-birthing and the forgiveness of God. The religious view may be seen through the entire poem, but another way to think of this poem is from the Victorian gender roles point of view. The readers think about how this speaker was put in their gender role, but failed at sticking with it. The narrator conveys a sense of emptiness due to them not being able to fulfill their duty as a lady or a gentleman, and not being able to be forgiven by God.

GOBLIN MARKET ANALYSIS

GOBLIN MARKET 

Because Goblin Market is such a long and complex poem – entire books have been written about it! – I’m approaching this one slightly differently. The full text is at the end of the guide. Below, you’ll find a quick summary of the key interpretations, and some idea of the technical basis for this interpretation, though there’ll be plenty more in the whole poem. You wouldn’t be expected to know the whole poem, and if it’s named on the paper only a section will be used, of course – but it’s worth really getting to grips with this one, because it can link to virtually everything in the rest of the collection.
While Goblin Market can be read as a children’s fairytale -and Rossetti insisted in public that’s what it was – there’s also far darker interpretations, and privately in a letter to her publisher, Christina said it shouldn’t be marketed to children – an interesting conflict to bear in mind! 
INTERPRETATION: CHILDREN’S FAIRYTALE
Morality tales for children were very common, often quite twee or clichéd, with a very obvious moral towards the end. Louis Carrol, in Alice in Wonderland, mocked these when Alice has a conversation with the Duchess about finding morals in other tales. Goblin Market can be read as a fable for children in which Laura’s curiosity nearly causes her death (and does in fact cause Jeannie’s), but in the end she’s saved by her sister’s love and the two of them go on to have happy, loving lives. Moral? Curiosity is bad, don’t look outside your world – but you can be rescued by a loving family. 
Evidence 
       The goblin creatures, common in fairytales, and described in animalistic terms but at least to begin with not frightening – more like woodland animals.
       Relative simplicity of vocabulary and syntax
       The balladesque narrative, which creates a story-like quality, like a fairytale
       The happy ending when balance is restored - Laura and Lizzie are “wives/with children of their own” and warn their own children 
INTERPRETATION: SEX AND SEXUALITY
 “Curious Laura” explores her sexuality with the Goblin men, who are at first animalistic but become more masculine as the poem continues. She experiences it with pure desire and lust, but her preoccupation with returning for more threatens to destroy her (link: Soeur Louise). Jeannie is the cautionary tale of a girl who similarly experienced desire, and it brought her death (perhaps a comment on the dangers of pregnancy and death in childbirth?) Lizzie, who remains stoic and refuses to give into desire, saves her sister. Even though Lizzie experiences the fruit of the goblins, she doesn’t enjoy it, and therefore is in some ways the ideal virtuous Victorian woman (Link: Maude Clare, From the Antique)
The poem explores rape and masculine power, in the goblins’ assault on Lizzie as they “push their fruits against her mouth”, for example; the men are wholly in control in this poem. There’s also a glimmer of homosexuality (and therefore incest), when Lizzie encourages Laura to “hug me, kiss me, suck my juices”. 
Yet as ever with Rossetti there’s a conflicting undertone – by the end, there’s no real difference between Laura and Lizzie. They both marry happily and have children (the pinnacle of feminine success?!) and so is this a protest that ‘fallen women’ shouldn’t be made to suffer for the rest of their lives, as Jeannie is? (Link: Winter: My Secret)
Evidence 
       Contrasting descriptions of Laura and Lizzie in their encounters with the goblins. Similarities with Jeannie. Look in particular a the colours and animal imagery of the girls (white, swan etc.) and the way they move – veiled versus looking
       Description of the rape of Lizzie
       Happy ending resolution 
       Contrast of the two sisters’ actions  
INTERPRETATION: PRESENTATION OF MASCULINTIY
Probably the most negative of Rossetti’s portrayals of men! The goblin creatures are animalistic, vicious and controlling – they exert complete power over the girls they tempt. And they do tempt; it’s their calls that bring Laura in, then when they have what they wanted from her they cast her aside, not caring that she is ruined (Link: From the Antique, Winter: My Secret). Rossetti’s work at the women’s refuge made her angry about the double standards for men and women – for women to be prostitutes, men must be buying their services! They assault Lizzie viciously and sexually, and they take both a part of Laura (her hair) and money from Lizzie, indicating that they take everything from a woman, perhaps a critique of the marriage laws restricting property ownership. 
Evidence 
       Animalistic descriptions of the goblins
       Goblins’ vicious, active verbs as they assault Lizzie 
       Disappearance of men at the end – although the girls are wives and mothers, their husbands aren’t mentioned. 
INTERPRETATION: CRITIQUE OF COMMERCE IN THE VICTORIAN ERA
The Goblins’ market cries sell fruit, a rarity and expensive in the era although becoming increasingly common with the improvements in trade, refrigeration and so on. There’s an abundance of it, maybe even too much, suggesting a critique of the consumerism that started with the Victorian development of the leisured classes, increasing wealth n the middle class, and ways to display that wealth. Cities also emerged in the era, and brought with them a moral panic and concern because of the close proximity of a huge population, influx of prostitutes, criminals and others considered to be an ‘underclass’, along with the movement of young people away from the family home completely changing the landscape of family relationships. Herbert Tucker has suggested that the techniques of the Goblins when trying to persuade Lizzie to buy from them are similar to complaints made about the rise of advertising in the era. 
There’s also an argument which looks at the poem as a critique of the marriage market in the era – what women can bring to a marriage determining their value (Link: Maude Clare, No Thank You John) Evidence 
       Abundance of the fruit which is “all ripe together” no matter what the season, as farmers/grocers started trying to manipulate growing times to suit a demanding population
       Laura’s temptation to buy and buy
       The exchanges – Laura’s gold hair, and Lizzie’s coin
       Listing of the fruits – chaotic, noisy and aggressive
       Repeated language of sweetness in the goblins’ allure – maybe a reference to the growth of sugar by slaves in America as the civil war was continuing (although this is speculative) . Juxtapose this slightly underhanded production with Lizzie and Laura’s wholesome domestic productivity
INTERPRETATION: RELIGIOUS NARRATIVE OF SALVATION AND SACRIFICE
Laura is humanity, an allegory for Eve’s sin committed by seeking out the fruit from the goblins as Eve sought the fruit from the tree of knowledge. When she obtains it, she is lost – her sinfulness is shown in her lack of interest in life and loss of industry, drawing on the Puritan/Christian work ethic, believing that hard work is a way to praise God. 
Lizzie’s self-sacrifice mirrors that of Christ. As he was crucified on the cross, Lizzie is assaulted by the Goblin men. She returns to Laura, and her words echo the Eucharist, the sacrament following the Last Supper when Jesus said to his disciplines drink this wine and eat this bread, for it is my blood and flesh – the ritual on which Communion is founded. Lizzie’s feeding of Laura is a close allegory of this ritual. (Link: Song, Remember, Good Friday, Birthday)
Evidence 
       The listing of fruit (acknowledging too that the fruit in the Bible isn’t specific as an apple)
       Laura’s return – “suck my juices”
       Self-sacrificing language describing Laura during the Goblin attack 
       Redemptive ending: both sisters are saved
INTERPRETATION: WOMANHOOD AND POWER
Sandra Gilbert has suggested that the fruit is access to the artistic world – being sold by men and for women to enter they have to give up so much of themselves, the worth is questionable.  Laura wants to be a part of it but it destroys her femininity – her ability to complete the domestic and moral tasks she is responsible for. Laura is creative and free, but that destroys her, and she must learn to control it to be a responsible mother. (Link: Birthday)
The girls are portrayed as the two sides of women – vice and virtue – although Laura is forgiven her misdemeanours. A “happy ending” is the two girls as wives and mothers, telling their own children morality tales. It’s perhaps a bit of a disappointing ending in some respects as after such a dark luscious tale, the girls return to a very stereotypical femininity. Yet Rossetti is a Victorian after all! (Link: Winter: My Secret, Maude Clare, From the Antique)
Evidence 
       Description of the two girls as “maids”, virginal colours, sweet and elegant creatures
       The language of desire including enjambment when Laura’s intense need is being described speeding the pace
       Ending with them both as wives and mothers
INTERPRETATION: AN ADDICTION NARRATIVE
The way Laura reacts to the goblins is classic addition – she grows pale, thin, listless and loses interest in anything else. All she can focus on is finding the next ‘fix’, the next opportunity to see the goblins and get some more fruit. Jeannie, who went before her, is dead of a similar addiction, perhaps through overdose. While this poem pre-dates the addictions of Dante Gabriel and Lizzie Siddal, there are striking similarities in the descriptions of Laura’s state post-goblin to an addict’s withdrawal symptoms. 
Evidence 
       Description of Laura as pale, thin, losing interest in the world around her 
       The “juices” functioning as a sort of methadone– a substitute used to wean addicts off the drug
       References to Jeannie’s destruction, first through what’s thinly veiled prostitution and then through death perhaps by overdone. 
INTERPRETATION: ELEMENTS OF THE GOTHIC
The Goblin men are a typical monstrous feature of Gothic literature – used as ciphers through which to explore the monstrous nature of mankind. Whether Rochester’s supernatural voice in Jane Eyre or the vampiric Dracula, the powers and desires of men are frequently exhibited through otherworldly creatures. 

The two sisters could also be considered doubles – two sides of one person, a common Gothic feature (consider Jane Eyre and Bertha Mason, for example). Laura is the darker, curious side, while Lizzie is the good urges of women. 
       They often act similarly but are described differently e.g. looking / veiled her eyes
       All the darker urges are in one, the selfless natue in the other
GOBLIN MARKET: STRUCTURE AND FORM
Meter: 
Mostly written in iambic tetrameter creating the rhythmic, fast pace – the passion of the story, as well as the iambic rhythm echoing natural speech, as though this is a fairytale read aloud in the oral tradition. However, there are many variations, interruptions and changes throughout the poem for different purposes.  
Most of the language associated with goblins is dactylic dimeter – a sense of incantation and, particularly with the listing of the fruits, speeds the pace further to add to the sense of abundance and loss of control. 
Lizzie shouts “no, no, no” – interrupting the rhythm, as well as exclaiming to stop Laura
Laura’s physical illness: “fetched honey', ‘brought water', ‘sat down') verbally indicate the way in which Laura is physically ‘seizing up' as her illness takes hold
In the description of Laura's recovery, spondees are used to give emphasis to the power of the antidote that Lizzie brings her. The repetition of the same initial letters in the phrases ‘Swift fire' and ‘Sense failed' (lines 507-513) further increases the sense of the rush of life that overcomes Laura as she recovers.
Rhyme
The irregular yet insistent rhyme carries the poem forwards. The poem contains numerous couplets which occur especially in its lists. This increases the speed at which the poem is read and creates a rushed and breathless feel. For instance, by framing the goblin's cry using couplets and triplets, Rossetti emphasizes its speed and draws attention to its overwhelming nature as it overpowers listeners with variety and quantity of description.
Repeated imagery
Roots and shoots, including the fruit – searching for knowledge, the idea that the fruit/knowledge reduces growth and fertility, and happiness. 
Fruit – symbolic of knowledge and curiosity, references to the biblical fruit as well as temptation more generally 
Hair – a huge cultural commodity and very popular in the Pre-Raphaelite brotherhood as a metaphor. Hair was put into bracelets and necklaces as keepsakes and memorials. Throughout the poetry of the period, women's hair has been variously depicted as a weapon, a veil, a snare, a web and a noose. Laura’s exchange of hair for fruit is also metaphoric of prostitution, handing over herself to the men. 
Narrative structure 

The poem tells the story from a third person perspective, so sounds more like an orally-transmitted fairytale than a written piece. It’s designed to be read aloud in that tradition. The atory begins close to the centre of the action with the two girls seeing the market appear. The height of tension is Lizzie’s travelling to the market and her exchange/assault. The story is resolved when both girls are happy wives and mothers, apparently fulfilled.